About Clarivo

Independent enough to question. Practical enough to deliver.

Clarivo Research & Evidence is a Uganda-first, founder-led specialist practice working at the intersection of research, health, biological science, education and data.

Our purpose

Close the distance between research and responsible action.

Research becomes useful when people can see what the evidence supports, what it does not and what to do next.

Clarivo exists to make that chain visible. We start with the decision, choose a proportionate method, preserve a reviewable working record and communicate findings without pretending uncertainty has disappeared.

Our Uganda-first perspective recognises local systems, constraints and knowledge. Our methods and reporting standards are designed to support regional and international collaboration.

Uganda-firstGrounded in local evidence needs and regional realities.
Founder-ledDirect accountability for scope, method and delivery.
Associate-enabledAdditional expertise added only when the work requires it.
Remote-readyStructured for collaboration in East Africa and internationally.

Management and delivery

Roles before titles.

Public profiles are used only when a role is active and the person has agreed to be identified. Delivery responsibility remains explicit on every assignment.

Core management

Founder & Practice Lead

Leads client scoping, evidence strategy, delivery accountability, publication decisions and the development of Clarivo’s methods.

Quality control

Methods & Quality Review

Challenges design, analysis, inference, documentation, privacy, disclosure and release readiness. Reviewer independence is matched to the assignment.

Extended capability

Associate Network

Subject experts, statisticians, qualitative researchers, evaluators, designers and field collaborators engaged through explicit roles and agreements.

Two scientists examining a flask together in a laboratory

Collaboration standard

Expertise must be real, named and accountable.

Associates are selected for the question, not added as decorative names. Roles, conflicts, confidentiality, review and authorship are agreed before work begins.

Ask about collaboration

Photo: Chidera Faustina Okeke · Unsplash

Associate criteria

What we look for in collaborators.

01

Competence

Relevant knowledge, demonstrable methods skill and honest limits.

02

Integrity

Respect for participants, data, authorship, disclosure and correction.

03

Reliability

Clear communication, documented work and responsibility for deadlines.

04

Reviewability

Willingness to share reasoning, records and code for appropriate review.

05

Context

Ability to understand the people, systems and constraints around the question.

06

Independence

Freedom to report uncomfortable findings and disclose material interests.

Work with a practice that states its limits.

Tell us the decision, intended users, desired output and timing. We will help determine whether the assignment is suitable and what a defensible scope looks like.

Request a scoped consultation