01
Health evidence
Infectious disease, malaria, antimicrobial resistance, laboratory and diagnostic questions, health communication and programme evidence—within clear approval and competence boundaries.
Discuss a health questionResearch & Evidence
Questions worth answering—methods strong enough to answer them.
Clarivo develops and communicates evidence across health, biological science, education and cross-sector development questions, with special attention to Uganda and East Africa.
Evidence areas
Focused domains, connected methods.
Subject knowledge matters, but so do research design, data quality and interpretation. Work outside core competence is declined or assembled with named associates.
02
Biological science
Biochemistry, microbiology, phytochemistry, systems biology and biological research methods, including evidence synthesis and reproducible analysis.
See related evidence03
Education evidence
Science learning, curriculum implementation, practical work, teacher support, assessment and responsible education technology in Ugandan and regional settings.
Scope an education study04
Research capacity
Methods learning, reproducible workflows, scientific writing, research integrity and practical systems that help small teams produce more defensible work.
Explore training05
Data for decisions
Public-data exploration, routine-data questions, research datasets, visual explanation and carefully bounded inference.
Review data standards06
Cross-sector problems
Climate, agriculture, livelihoods, digital access and other questions where health, education or evidence systems meet implementation.
Test project fit
Independent research
Practise the full standard before a client arrives.
Clarivo can publish desk-based evidence briefs, methods notes and public-data analyses when questions, authorship, sources, limitations and corrections are visible.
Explore the publication modelPhoto: ThisIsEngineering · Unsplash
Independent research pathway
From a public problem to a citable output.
Desk-based work still needs a protocol, records and review. Human-participant or restricted-data work follows a different, approval-gated route.
Define
Name the decision, users, question and scope.
Screen
Check conflicts, thesis overlap, ethics, privacy and permissions.
Protocol
Specify sources, eligibility, extraction, analysis and change control.
Execute
Preserve searches, data lineage, code, decisions and deviations.
Publish
Release status, citation, disclosures, limitations and correction history.
Questions in view
A live research agenda, not invented project claims.
These are problem areas suitable for responsible scoping. They are not presented as commissioned or completed assignments.
A
Practical science learning
What evidence explains gaps between curriculum intentions, laboratory access, teacher support and actual practical learning?
B
Malaria evidence use
How can programme teams communicate changing malaria, vaccine and resistance evidence without turning uncertainty into inaction?
C
Research reproducibility
Which low-cost practices most improve traceability, analysis quality and handover in small research teams?
Have a question that belongs on the agenda?
Tell us the decision, intended users, desired output and timing. We will help determine whether the assignment is suitable and what a defensible scope looks like.